Innovative Office Products v. Amazon.com Innovative Office Products, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Civil Action No. 10-4487 United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania April 26, 2012 Innovative Office Products, Inc., v. Amazon.com, Inc., et. al., No. 10-4487, U.S. Dist. Ct. E.D. PA., 2012: This is a patent infringement case involving Plaintiff
Read more →Discovery Patents v. Amazon.com DISCOVERY PATENT HOLDINGS, LLC. V. AMAZON.COM, INC., NO. 10-600-ER, U.S. Dist. Ct. Delaware, 2011. This is a patent infringement case involving four patents, two from Discovery and two from Amazon. Both parties presented complex defenses in regards to the patents in question. Case Details: Issue: What
Read more →Isack Kousnsky v Amazon Inc. (2nd Cir., 2015) This is a copyright infringement case involving a seller’s artwork and Amazon.com. Plaintiff Isack Kousnsky sued Amazon for copyright infringement for failing to take corrective action when Plaintiff notified them that a third party was infringing his rights by selling his artwork
Read more →Steven Rosner v Amazon Inc. S132 A.D.3d 835, 18 N.Y.S.3d 155 (2d Dept. 2015) This is a defamation case between plaintiff Rosner and Amazon.com. Plaintiff sued Amazon for defamation after Amazon refused to remove a bad review on Plaintiff’s listing of its book for sale on Amazon’s website. The Court
Read more →Amazon Listing Ranking Tips for Sellers As an Amazon Seller, what’s your main goal? Sales, of course. As a seller, you’re probably always on the lookout for a new technique to increase your sales on Amazon. One major aspect of maximizing your sales on the platform is learning how to
Read more →Amazon Kindle Oasis: Top Tech Features Available for pre-order today, the new Amazon Kindle Oasis is lighter, thinner, and packs more hours of battery life than any of the previous models. A dual-charging system for the battery allows for several weeks of power without recharging the device. This new system
Read more →How Does Amazon Inventory Management Work? You’re on your computer or mobile device searching for that pair of shoes you’ve been wanting or that new book that was released by your favorite author. Of course, you find yourself on Amazon.com. With the most competitive pricing in the industry, the convenience of
Read more →Acorne Enterprises, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc ACORNE ENTERPRISES, LLC (Plaintiff) v. EURO-PRO OPERATING LLC; AMAZON.COM, INC.; WAL-MART STORES, INC.; TARGET CORPORATION; BED BATH & BEYOND INC.; SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.; KMART CORPORATION; MACY’S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.; KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.; BJ’S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. (Defendants) Case No. 3:12-cv-00602-RCJ-WGC UNITED STATES
Read more →Amazon Loans Help Sellers Finance Operations An interesting new program being offered by Amazon is stirring up a lot of interest among sellers looking to finance their online sales capabilities on a larger scale. Amazon Loans is an invite-only service that is offered strictly to selected sellers. It’s targeted towards
Read more →Amazon.com Inc. v Cristi Cessna AMAZON.COM; AND SEDGWICK CMS, Appellants, v. CRISTI CESSNA, Respondent. No. 63675 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA April 17, 2015 This is a workers’ compensation case between appellants Amazon.com and Sedgwick CMS v. respondent Cristi Cessna involving an appeal from a district court order
Read more →Handheld Products Inc. v Amazon Inc. Amazon Wins: Handheld Products, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No.: 12-768-RGA-MPT, U.S. Dist. Ct. Del., 2014: In order to infringe upon a patent, the actions taken must follow the same sequence or order of actions outlined in the patent. Handheld Products, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.,
Read more →Dean Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon Wins: Dean Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 14-cv-4513, U.S. Dist. Ct. (E.D.N.Y. 2015): Arbitration was proper forum for plaintiff’s issue where they agreed to arbitration prior to using Amazon’s website to make a purchase. Dean Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 14-cv-4513, U.S. Dist. Ct. (E.D.N.Y. 2015) Procedural:
Read more →Pinpoint, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon Wins: Pinpoint, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 347 F.Supp.2d 579, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Illinois, 2004: Amazon successfully argued Pinpoint did not have standing to bring patent infringement case when it did not own the patents at issue. Pinpoint, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 347 F.Supp.2d 579, U.S.
Read more →Soverain Software, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Soverain Software LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., 383 F.Supp.2d 904, U.S. Dist. Ct., E.D. Texas, 2005: Amazon successfully argued that it did not have notice of alleged infringement until the suit began in order to remediate and so case was dismissed. Soverain Software, LLC
Read more →Ayse Sen v. Amazon.com Amazon wins: Ayse Sen v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 12 cv 2878, Southern District of CA 2013: Court found in favor of Amazon where there was a settlement agreement already reached. AYSE SEN v. AMAZON.COM, INC., No.12cv2878, SOUTHERN DIST. OF CA, 2013 Issue: The enforceability of a disputed
Read more →Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 06-P-1048, Appeals Ct. MA, 2008: Plaintiff successfully argued that an enforceable settlement had been reached via e-mail exchanges that were read for the record in court. Issue: The enforceability of a disputed mid-trial settlement agreement Case Details Plaintiff sued
Read more →Milo & Gabby v. Amazon.com Amazon wins: Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., NO. C13-1932RSM, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. of Wash., 2015: Plaintiff lost because Amazon was protected from infringement of third-party vendor’s under the DMCA. Issue: Did Amazon commit IP infringement via third-party vendors on Amazon.com? Procedural background: Plaintiff
Read more →Tre Milano, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc TRE MILANO, LLC (Plaintiff and Appellant) v. AMAZON.COM, INC. (Defendants and Respondents) B234753, Cal. Ct. of Appeals, 2nd App. Dist., 2012: Amazon was not responsible for infringement by third-party and could not be held contributorily liable since it took immediate action once notified of
Read more →Sanmedica International, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. Sanmedica International, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00169-DN, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. of Utah, Central Div., 2015: Court refused to grant Amazon’s motion to dismiss where it found the use of Plaintiff’s trademark may cause initial interest confusion and this was a question for
Read more →Multi Time Machine v. Amazon.com Amazon loses: Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 13-55575, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th Cir., 2015: Plaintiff successfully argued that Amazon could have confused customers – Plaintiff did not sell items on Amazon, but when customers searched for it, Amazon returned results with Plaintiff’s trademark
Read more →Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. CV03-1415L, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. Washington, 2004: Amazon is protected from liability under the DMCA for copyright infringement occurring on its third party vendor platform. Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. CV03-1415L, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. Washington, 2004 Issue:
Read more →